The Alliance is a global group of individuals cooperating to improve the world. Each member spends a small fraction of their time completing tasks that advance our shared goals.
Our long-term goal is to unite humanity behind a democratic, expert-developed plan to end global crises. Right now, we are running experiments to test our organizational structures and processes.
Our immediate goal is to end global crises that harm or will harm billions of current and future people. In no particular order, we are focused on:
The Alliance is composed of a general body of members and a full-time office of members.
Our strategy depends on members' reliability. With high and predictable levels of participation, we can make precise and effective action plans. For example:
As a result, we restrict membership to those who sign and abide by our membership contract.
I commit to complete up to 15 minutes of Alliance tasks per week.
I commit to complete every task I am assigned by its deadline, unless:
a. I have spent more than 15 minutes completing Alliance tasks in the past week.
b. I cannot complete the task due to a serious external circumstance, such as a medical issue or family emergency. In this case, I will inform the strategic office as soon as I can.
c. I believe the task is immoral. In this case, I will inform the strategic office of my reasoning by the deadline for the task.
I understand that I am considered an active member, and am therefore able to participate in Alliance governance, if I have completed at least 8 of the last 10 tasks I was assigned.
Our current membership contract
Right now, we are taking small-scale actions focused on learning, not direct impact. Here are examples of actions we have taken:
Plan your contribution to a collective donation to Helen Keller International
Members found ways to earn or save money to donate more than $3,000 collectively to Helen Keller International, an effective nonprofit addressing global malnutrition.
Discuss the repeal of the endangerment finding with current and former U.S. EPA employees
Members discussed the repeal of the EPA's endangerment finding, as well as the current state of the EPA, with current and former EPA employees.
Help inform public comments on U.S. federal AI policy
Members were asked questions about personal experiences and beliefs related to three federal dockets on AI policy. Then, the office posted three official comments summarizing members' answers.
Sign a letter requesting news coverage of a bring-your-own-cup cafe coalition
The office asked several cafes to adopt and advertise a bring-your-own-cup policy, promising that members would help them attain media coverage. Then, members signed a letter to journalists requesting a feature. Finally, a journalist wrote an article about the cafes.
As the Alliance grows, we plan to bring together experts from diverse fields to make increasingly impactful, long-term plans. Our online platform will enable direct communication between these experts and millions of members to enact rapid, large-scale change.
It is difficult to know exactly which actions we will take after we launch. However, a few broad categories of actions include:
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Economic shifts |
|
| Pooled funding |
|
| Social pressure |
|
| Direct action |
|
Members provide input and participate in governance that ensures approval of the overall direction of the Alliance.
Meanwhile, the office has the freedom to make any plans that advance our high-level priorities and make effective use of members’ time and resources.
Planning actions is a creative, open-ended process that searches for levers of change which members can pull.
In ideation for and development of an action plan, the office weighs many considerations. For instance:
Our governance guarantees that the majority of members approve of the Alliance's direction.
We conduct a membership-wide oversight process that occurs on a regular basis. In the process, the office asks members if they want the Alliance to continue operating as usual, or to stop actions and adjust how it operates. The office collects and responds to feedback until we reach an approval threshold of 75%.
This procedure achieves two goals:
It is inevitable, though rare, that some members are assigned tasks whose justifications they do not agree with. Given the urgency of global crises, we collectively prioritize action over perfect consensus.
In addition to formal governance, the office incorporates member input by other means. For instance, the office hosts discussions, asks members for action proposals, solicits open-ended feedback, and so on.